First Lady Got Back
I read an op-ed in the Chicago Sun-Times a few days ago and that was the title. It originally ran on Salon.com and was written by Erin Aubry Kaplan, who introduces the piece saying, “I'm a black woman who never thought I'd see a powerful, beautiful female with a body like mine in the White House. Then I saw Michelle Obama -- and her booty!”
Kaplan’s essay isn’t just fluff. It delves into areas such as the fetishization of the African-American woman’s behind throughout history, and the lack of attainable body image ideals for black women in today’s society. Her ultimate point is that Michelle Obama, a beautiful, statuesque woman with curves for days, is ushering in a new beauty norm. She looks nothing like any First Lady before her, and rather similar to many of our black friends, family members and coworkers. Kaplan discusses the frequent comparisons between Obama and Jackie Kennedy and writes, “While I appreciate the spirit, I beg to differ. To put it bluntly, Jackie had no back. Same can be said for gaunt Cindy McCain and the short-lived Republican sexpot Sarah Palin. Jackie was trim and perfect, an inoffensive figure who bucked the curviness of the '50s and put American femininity on the treacherous path of smaller-is-better. Jackie was also a blue blood and a society woman -- an elite! -- so although she set new beauty and fashion paradigms, she also followed old ones.”
Sir Mix-A-Lot references aside, this is an interesting discussion but part of me wonders, is it necessary? The Obamas aren’t even on Pennsylvania Avenue yet but already there are articles springing up about HER BUTT?? Is this necessary?
I don’t deny the importance of the topic in general –hello, I’m a body image writer myself! Discussing ethnic and cultural differences in body acceptance is a fascinating topic. And the fact is, as Kaplan writes, “ordinary black women have waited a long time for this… In a country simultaneously obsessed with consumer excess and weight control, we've been caught in the middle. Throw race into the mix, and we've been downright strangled. The expectations run something like this: It's OK for black women to be heavier than most, but we still have to conform to a universal (that is, white) standard of thinness and shape. This means that, even if you're 120 pounds, your butt better not account for more than 2 percent of that.”
I suppose I just never thought about the fact that Michelle will be representing a brand new physical aesthetic, one that hasn’t been filled in such a manner in…well, ever. The First Lady WILL look different than any other First Lady and many, many young women across the globe will have a new role model to look up to. But not JUST because of her body – because she is strong and accomplished and capable and a straight-shooter.
And yes, I suppose, because she’s got a great boot-ay.

Lindsay Dunlap
Leslie Goldman
Liria Mersini
BlogHer

Comments
Date: 12/01/2008 - 11:34 am
In Canada our politicians aren't looked at in the same way as they are in the States. In the States it seems as though the president and all is a celebrity, whereas in Canada that just doesn't happen (maybe we don't care as much about politics? Or because Canada doesn't have as much of an effect on the global economy etc as the States does?). So it's kind of interesting to hear this point of view.
I think you're right- she's going to be a great role model because of her strength and accomplishments and all, just as much as her body!
That last quote from Kaplan is going to have me pondering this all day.
Date: 12/01/2008 - 03:10 pm
It is funny, because this is Harper's second term, and I still can't name his wife (or any of the spouses of any candidates in memory, except Trudeau). American politics focuses so much more on the family than in Canada. It is interesting but odd.
Anyway, she will hopefully be an awesome role model. Good luck to her!!
Date: 12/01/2008 - 04:03 pm
This article has caused some controversy around the blogosphere. I read another post where the editor of salon.com had to address the amount of negative feedback received about it. I get where the anger (mostly from other black women) comes from. I mean, I've never read any article making such a big deal about one particular part of any other first lady. Why Michelle? The fact that another black woman chose to bring this up is quite strange and almost disrespectful.
I admire Michelle O. for her accomplishments not her assets. I don't think she should have used her butt as the springboard for the author's other (valid) points.
Date: 12/01/2008 - 05:34 pm
I'm also of two minds about this. I get so tired of accomplished women getting press coverage for their appearance rather than their brains and beliefs and accomplishments. So the sheer number of articles about what she wears or how she looks drives me nuts.
On the other hand, in the context of women's bodies and body image, I do think having a first lady who stands in beautiful contrast to the stick-figure 'ideal' that the media is usually foisting on us--that's pretty damn cool. Time for us all to be more accepting of our bodies, whatever the heck they look like.
Crabby from Cranky Fitness
Date: 12/01/2008 - 08:44 pm
I agree with that comment about Canadian are different in judging president`s spouse and family.
President is the one who will be making marks in history and all what matter is how smart He and His wife is.Her body image is God`s work.He created Her.He gave Her wisdom and that what we as American`s should look at Her.